Home page > Food and Agriculture > Food and Nutrition > Obesity and overweight issues > *UPDATED* Towards banning junk food (...)

After extensive research and public consultation, Ofcom, have put forward restrictions which are intended to limit children’s exposure to television advertising of food and drink products which are high in fat, salt and sugar.

However, campaigners are “disappointed” Ofcom has not banned all junk food ads before the 9pm watershed.

According to the British Medical Association (BMA), the restrictions fall short of a comprehensive ban, despite the evidence that TV advertising has an effect on children’s eating habits. Furthermore, the British Heart Foundation believe that “this limited proposal will be further weakened by lucrative loopholes open to exploitation.”

The restrictions will apply during children’s programmes and on children’s channels. However, according to Sustain, two thirds (71%) of the TV an average child watches is outside traditional children’s TV hours. The Food Standards Agency (FSA), have sent a letter to Ofcom welcoming the restrictions, but call for further restriction up to the 9pm watershed. In addition, Diabetes UK, the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK and others, call for a 9pm watershed for junk food advertising to be adopted by the British Government.

The European picture: revising the Television Without Frontiers Directive

The debate is part of a larger European picture, with the recent (December 2005) revision of the Commission’s "Television without Frontiers" Directive.

EPHA advocates for better regulation of advertising, known as "audiovisual commercial communications".

EPHA calls for restrictions on the commercial communications to children of foods that contribute to an unhealthy diet.

In addition, EPHA urges a 6am - ­9pm watershed on audiovisual commercial communication of unhealthy foods and drinks, which would help cover the times when children are most likely to be watching television.

This follows a landmark evidence-based report published in 2003 showing a clear link between advertising and rising rates of obesity prevalence among children.

- EPHA position paper on the Television Without Frontiers Directive

A landmark report on the link between advertising and obesity

On 24 September 2003, the UK’s Food Standards Agency published the first hard evidence blaming television advertising for the excessive consumption of junk food that is causing an increase of obesity among young people: "Does Food Promotion Influence Children? A Systematic Review of the Evidence."

The research was lead by Professor Gerard Hastings, Director of Centre for Social Marketing of the Strathclyde university.

This report establishes beyond reasonable doubt that advertising influences what children eat as well as the brands they prefer.

The agency said it may consider recommending health warnings on packets of soft drinks and snacks, or restrictions on the advertising of these products as well as of fast-food chains such as McDonald’s.

- The main report

- The appendix to the report


- New Which? report exposes UK companies who market junk food to children

- UK Parliament demands action on obesity

- World’s biggest 25 food companies not taking health seriously enough
- Just how worried is the food industry?

- Promotion of healthy food in Latvia’s schools

- Food marketing to children Vs Halting the obesity epidemic

Last modified on February 1 2007.

Your feedback is valuable to us!

Was this article interesting and relevant for you? Do you have any comments?

7 Forum messages

Our readers have published these comments:

11 April 2006 09:46, by Romina

Report finds direct link between junk food ads and children’s obesity

Dear Sir/ Madam, 10/04/2006

I would like to express my opinion about your report. I totally agree with you and I don’t think people realize their diet isn’t efficient enough or isn’t actually a diet.

Diet doesn’t mean eating less, but rather eating better! As you said it, people could be obese and at the same time undernourished, that means, they just eat sweets, desserts, snacks or drink alcohol wich are contributing calories but neighter vitamines nor minerals. When we take a look at the figures, we see 30% of the calories from junk food is consumed, by Americans, and only 10% calories due to vitamines and minerals.

I would like to sensitise each of us to the dangers of junk food and the way you can get addicted to it! Everybody should be aware of that kind of situation and should eat junk food with moderation.

Reply to this message

20 October 2006 12:02, by random
i do not think they should ban junk food, as it is not the advetisements that tell us to eat excessively it is the parents that let children eat excessively they should not be ridiculing advertisements, they should have advertisements that promote exercise as this is the main cos of obesity, laziness

Reply to this message

19 December 2006 15:04

The World Health Organisation has published evidence regarding the links between advertisements and the consumption of junk food. For more information please also read the report on food promotion to children by the University of Strathclyde

EPHA Secretariat

Reply to this message

18 September 2006 11:19, by hope

Towards banning junk food advertising? The UK debates

I think that most junk food adverts appeal to younger children because they aren’t old enough to know what is really good for them. They haven’t got experience so they are easily influenced. They mainly look at the pictures, free gifts, bright colours and the music of the advert. They don’t always understand or know what the food really is, unlike older people. Most adverts aimed at young children use toys, adventures, competitions with prizes, for example kinder egg surprise, kids have to collect all the small prizes inside of the chocolate. There is also a game on their website for them. Kids get excited and interested, so companies use this to their advantage because they know that they will succeed. Using popular children’s toys to help sell junk food is unfair and wrong in my opinion. It is taking away their innocence and fooling them.

McDonalds - ;mmm im lovin it’ by Justin Timberlake. He is an ideal to young girls so they are more interested and drawn to the McDonalds advert because of him. Young children like the advert because of the free toy you receive with ‘happy meals’. They make the adverts with families with small children in it, bright colours and fun pictures to make it attractive. This all has an influence on the people that watch the advert. Their recent adverts are trying to say that there are ‘healthy options’ at McDonalds, so people aren’t so afraid and are convinced that you can eat healthy at McDonalds but adding a piece fruit to junk food does not make it any healthier.

Chocolate adverts are related to romance, satisfaction, and comfort and normally have beautiful woman in them. This makes people think that chocolate is the cure for happiness however in reality it can lead to obesity and depression, (because it becomes addictive), bad skin (if eaten to often) and it can also rot your teeth.

Reply to this message

20 February 19:11, by jeffry

*UPDATED* Towards banning junk food advertising? The UK debates

they shouldent ban junk food adverts its pointless its our choice what we eat they are mear comments on what supermarkets have in stall

Reply to this message

20 February 19:16, by ben eccles

*UPDATED* Towards banning junk food advertising? The UK debates

why should the goverment ban advertisements for junk food its a good treat i agree that if you are having junk food every night you should cut down but 1. that has nothing two do with advertisements and 2.advertisements basicly show you yhe foods they dont say eat it..eat it....they are simply advertiseing food basicly

Reply to this message

4 April 18:41, by jon
your dumb. what you said means nothing at all. you talk in circles and make me dumber

Reply to this message