The consultation period with EPHA members closed on 7 August 2009. Please find the results of the 360 degree below.

Results

1. Please indicate the policy area(s) that your organisation works on.

Health Determinants 68.0%

Health Systems 68.0%

EU Systems 36.0%

2. Based on your answer(s) to question 1, what is your satisfaction level with the priority areas for 2008 in this strand of EPHA’s work?

Health Determinants

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 0.0% No opinion 25.0% Satisfactory 35.0% Good 40.0%

Health Systems

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 5.3% No opinion 10.5% Satisfactory 63.2% Good 21.1%

EU Systems

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 7.7% No opinion 7.7% Satisfactory 53.8% Good 30.8%

3. Based on your answer(s) to question 1, what is your opinion on EPHA’s approach to these priority areas in 2008?

Health Determinants

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 0.0% No opinion 20.0% Satisfactory 45.0% Good 35.0%

Health Systems

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 10.5% No opinion 15.8% Satisfactory 52.6% Good 21.1%

EU Systems

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 0.0% No opinion 7.7% Satisfactory 61.5% Good 30.8%

4. Based on your answer(s) to question 1, what do you think EPHA’s support to your organisation in this area has been?

Health Determinants

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 5.0% No opinion 35.0% Satisfactory 25.0% Good 35.0%

Health Systems

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 10.5% No opinion 31.6% Satisfactory 36.8% Good 21.1%

EU Systems

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 23.1% No opinion 15.4% Satisfactory 38.5% Good 23.1%

5. Based on your answer(s) to question 1, overall in 2008 do you think EPHA’s work in this area has:

Health Determinants

Worsened 0.0% Stayed the same 57.9% Improved 42.1%

Health Systems

Worsened 0.0% Stayed the same 52.9% Improved 47.1%

EU Systems

Worsened 0.0% Stayed the same 33.3% Improved 66.7%

6. Please indicate your satisfaction level with the following:

The extent to which EPHA took your opinion into consideration in 2008

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 12.0% No opinion 20.0% Satisfactory 44.0% Good 24.0%

The way EPHA consulted with its members in 2008

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 4.0% No opinion 8.0% Satisfactory 52.0% Good 36.0%

EPHA’s decision making processes in 2008

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 4.0% No opinion 28.0% Satisfactory 48.0% Good 20.0%

The activities of the Executive Committee in 2008

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 0.0% No opinion 40.0% Satisfactory 48.0% Good 12.0%

7. Overall in 2008, do you think EPHA’s governance has:

Worsened 0.0% Stayed the same 56.0% Improved 44.0%

8. Please indicate your satisfaction level with EPHA’s communication in 2008.

Newsletter

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 4.2% No opinion 0.0% Satisfactory 50.0% Good 45.8%

Policy coordination meetings (PCMs)

Poor 4.2% Unsatisfactory 4.2% No opinion 12.5% Satisfactory 45.8% Good 33.3%

Briefing notes

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 4.2% No opinion 16.7% Satisfactory 37.5% Good 41.7%

Website

Poor 4.2% Unsatisfactory 8.3% No opinion 4.2% Satisfactory 50.0% Good 33.3%

9. Please indicate your satisfaction level with the following:

How EPHA’s ways of working in 2008 matched the needs of your organisation

Poor 4.2% Unsatisfactory 12.5% No opinion 12.5% Satisfactory 45.8% Good 25.0%

The level of communication received from the Secretariat in 2008

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 4.2% No opinion 8.3% Satisfactory 50.0% Good 37.5%

The level of communication received from the Executive Committee in 2008

Poor 4.2% Unsatisfactory 20.8% No opinion 29.2% Satisfactory 29.2% Good 16.7%

10. Overall in 2008, do you think that EPHA’s ways of working with your organisation has:

Worsened 4.2% Stayed the same 79.2% Improved 16.7%

11. Please indicate your satisfaction level with the quality of EPHA’s services.

Website

Poor 4.2% Unsatisfactory 16.7% No opinion 4.2% Satisfactory 50.0% Good 25.0%

Newsletter

Poor 4.2% Unsatisfactory 0.0% No opinion 0.0% Satisfactory 50.0% Good 45.8%

Training

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 12.5% No opinion 62.5% Satisfactory 16.7% Good 8.3%

Information

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 8.3% No opinion 4.2% Satisfactory 54.2% Good 33.3%

Advocacy

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 12.5% No opinion 16.7% Satisfactory 37.5% Good 33.3%

12. Please indicate your satisfaction level with the following:

EPHA’s range of services

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 8.3% No opinion 12.5% Satisfactory 50.0% Good 29.2%

EPHA’s value for money

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 12.5% No opinion 25.0% Satisfactory 45.8% Good 16.7%

The extent to which EPHA communicates its services effectively

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 20.8% No opinion 16.7% Satisfactory 41.7% Good 20.8%

13. Overall in 2008, do you think that EPHA’s services have:

Worsened 4.2% Stayed the same 62.5% Improved 33.3%

13. Please rate the following:

EPHA’s visibility in Brussels

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 0.0% No opinion 41.7% Satisfactory 29.2% Good 29.2%

EPHA’s overall reputation

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 4.2% No opinion 20.8% Satisfactory 37.5% Good 37.5%

EPHA’s reputation among its members

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 0.0% No opinion 25.0% Satisfactory 33.3% Good 41.7%

EPHA’s reputation among key decision makers in Brussels

Poor 0.0% Unsatisfactory 8.3% No opinion 29.2% Satisfactory 33.3% Good 29.2%

13. Overall in 2008, do you think that EPHA’s reputation:

Worsened 0.0% Stayed the same 58.3% Improved 41.7%


Related articles: EPHA wants your opinion!

Last modified on November 6 2009.